Friday we were 2-0 for +2.0 units. Orlando won outright as a 7.5 point dog at home. We got a scare on the under in the Memphis game when it went into overtime but the under was still good.
Also we just hit 400 units bet and are at +11.38% return. We have completed 4 months and all 4 are positive. Feb we are almost even. So very encouraging so far.
Today I have looked over the nba and nhl and dont see anything worth betting on. So no bets today.
RickJ
Record to date:
mlb(05-06 season,started end of season)
Sides: 17- 14 +6.83
o/u 3-8-1 -5.09
ncaafb (06-07 completed)
Sides 36-27-2 +9.14
o/u 11-12 -1.63
nfl(06-07 completed)
Sides 26-10-1 +15.56
o/u 7-4 +2.83
nhl
sides 29-30 +4.31
Nba
Side 65-55-1 +7.32
o/u 25-16 +8.43
Oct: 132 bets + 11.63 units +8.81% Return
Nov: 105 bets + 25.19 units +24.0% Return
Dec: 94 bets + 1.99 units +2.11% Return
Jan: 57 bets + 6.92 units +12.14% Return
Feb: 14 bets -.20 units -1.42% Return
Total 400 Bets + 45.53 units +11.38% Return
Leave a Comment
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
I see 402 bets, not 400. And shouldn’t %Return be based on amount risked (#bets plus vig)?
Not trying to be nitpicker, Rick, just asking!
hi rick, thanks for friday! like your approach. doug
Pete…hmmm…I think your are right on both…somewhere I must of not added two units to the total…i will correct that tomorrow.
You are also correct on the amount wagered…didnt really think of that…I dont think it would change things more then .25 percent since some bets are money line wagers also. I dont have the energy to go back and figure that out..so I am going to keep it as is….
thanks for the input
rick
After a bit more thought…the amount wager would not be right…the percentage return is based upon the number of bets divided by the amount won or lost. The juice is taken into consideration in the total won or lost.
It would be a duplication to add it in twice!
Rick