Wedn we went 1-2 for -.40 units. Texas came through as a +160 dog….florida hung in there as a +2.00 dog …0-0 going into the 9th..but San diego scored in the bottom of the 9th to win 1-2. Our total lost by 1.5 runs.
Today 2 plays in mlb.
Florida +220
Florida: (R) KIM, B.H. San Diego: (R) PEAVY, J
Texas +150
Los Angeles-A: (R) ESCOBAR, K Texas: (R) TEJEDA, R
Good Luck
Rick J
http://rickjshandicappingpicks.blogspot.com/
Record to date:
MLB(07 Season)
Sides: 41-49 +6.40
O/U: 14-12-1 +1.90
mlb(06 season,started end of season)
Sides: 17- 14 +6.83
o/u 3-8-1 -5.09
WNBA
Sides: 3-1 +1.95
Total: 0-1 -1.05
ncaafb (06-07 completed)
Sides 36-27-2 +9.14
o/u 11-12 -1.63
nfl(06-07 completed)
Sides 26-10-1 +15.56
o/u 7-4 +2.83
nhl
sides 35-36 +6.66
total 4-5 -1.10
Nba
Side 78-77 -2.75
o/u 31-25 +4.98
Oct: 132 bets + 11.63 units +8.81%
Nov: 105 bets + 25.19 units +24.0%
Dec: 94 bets + 1.99 units +2.11%
Jan: 57 bets + 6.92 units +12.14%
Feb: 31 bets -6.75 units -21.77%
Mar: 40 bets -9.75 units -24.37%
April: 34 bets +3.42 units +10.06%
May: 49 bets -3.64 units -7.43%
JUne: 46 bets +14.66units +31.87%
July: 7 bets -1.40 units -20.00%
Total 593 Bets + 42.59 units +7.18%
Leave a Comment
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
could you start explaining just a couple sentences maybe on why you like the picks that you make…
-always on em rick
The plays are really generated by a completely objective analysis first by two independent neural net softwares, and then results filtered by me with a number of different objective parameters.
My personal preference has nothing to do with these plays.
Hope this explains things better
let me add one more thing…these plays are about value..not who is going to win the game…if you got +2.25 every day on a team that was really +2.00 you would end up with most of the money….that is in my opinion what sports betting is all about..
Finding Value!!!!
RickJ